• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
COVID19-NMR

COVID19-NMR

  • About
    • Mission
    • Participation Guidelines
    • Data Management Plan
    • Research Targets
    • Timeline
  • News
  • Results
    • RNA Results
    • Protein Results
    • Screening RNA
    • Screening Protein
  • Publications
  • Participants
    • Core Team
    • Research Partners
    • Lab Members
    • Corporate Partners
    • Governance Board

Publications

DOI

J. Am. Chem. Soc. (2021) - Published online

Concordance of X-ray and AlphaFold2 Models of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease with Residual Dipolar Couplings Measured in Solution

A. J. Robertson, J. M. Courtney, Y. Shen, J. Ying, A. Bax

The 68-kDa homodimeric 3C-like protease of SARS-CoV-2, Mpro (3CLpro/Nsp5), is a promising antiviral drug target. We evaluate the concordance of models generated by the newly introduced AlphaFold2 structure prediction program with residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) measured in solution for 15N–1HN and 13C′–1HN atom pairs. The latter were measured using a new, highly precise TROSY-AntiTROSY Encoded RDC (TATER) experiment. Three sets of AlphaFold2 models were evaluated: (1) MproAF, generated using the standard AlphaFold2 input structural database; (2) MproAFD, where the AlphaFold2 implementation was modified to exclude all candidate template X-ray structures deposited after Jan 1, 2020; and (3) MproAFS, which excluded all structures homologous to coronaviral Mpro. Close agreement between all three sets of AlphaFold models and experimental RDC data is found for most of the protein. For residues in well-defined secondary structure, the agreement decreases somewhat upon Amber relaxation. For these regions, MproAF agreement exceeds that of most high-resolution X-ray structures. Residues from domain 2 that comprise elements of both the active site and the homo-dimerization interface fit less well across all structures. These results indicate novel opportunities for combining experimentation with molecular dynamics simulations, where solution RDCs provide highly precise input for QM/MM simulations of substrate binding/reaction trajectories.

Funded by


Goethe Corona Fonds

DFG

Volkswagen Stiftung

Footer

Coordination

Prof. Dr. Harald Schwalbe (Coordinator)
Institut für Organische Chemie und Chemische Biologie
Zentrum für Biomolekulare Magnetische Resonanz

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität
N160-3.13
Max-von-Laue-Strasse 7
D-60438 Frankfurt am Main

Contact us

++49 69 798 29737
schwalbe@nmr.uni-frankfurt.de

Twitter
 LOGS

Scientific Data Management powered by
Communication powered by
SIGNALS

Imprint | Privacy Policy

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT